NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent

Grand Canyon University NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent                       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent                       

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent                       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1

Review the evidence-based practice project ideas you described in Topic 5 DQ 1. Based on your initial ideas, what types of scholarly nursing research (such as quantitative or qualitative research, peer-reviewed resources, etc.) would be required to further investigate the issue? Identify the criteria you would use to evaluate the appropriateness of the research. Why is it important to select research that meets these criteria?

Re: Topic 6 DQ 1

My evidenced-based project idea focuses on implementing a community education program that focuses on prevention in regard to stroke risk factors. When implementing any new program, it’s imperative to gather evidence and analyze how it can improve patient outcomes, health policies, service and programs as evidence allows for increased accountability (DeNisco & Barker, 2016). When gathering evidence for any project it’s important to understand different types of research and the different levels of evidence (Glasofer &Townsend, 2019). Evidence strength is dictated by three key characteristics, quality, quantity and consistency (Glasofer &Townsend, 2019). When selecting research for any topic it should be quality research that has results that are valid and not influenced by biases or occur by chance (art). Quantity can be evaluated by identified the number of studies on said topic, the size and population of the studies and the impact of the treatments (Glasofer &Townsend, 2019). Consistency is when results that are similar are found across a few different studies (Glasofer &Townsend, 2019).

When selecting research for my topic I would typically select research topics that are considered level on in the hierarchy of evidence. These are RCT, systematic review of an RCT and metanalysis if an RCT (Glasofer &Townsend, 2019). Under this topic I would likely consider including a mixture of quantitative and qualitative research. When working with prevention practices its important to understand how behavior plays a role in changing health practices and that why it’s important to analyze qualitative research in addition to quantitative.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent Reference

DeNisco, S. M., & Barker, A. M. (2016). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Glasofer, A., & Townsend, A. B. (2019). Determining the level of evidence. Nursing Critical Care, 14(6), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccn.0000580120.03118.1d

RESPOND  HERE (150 WORDS, 2 REFERENCES)

This is insightful Meagan, the implementation of the new research program requires collection and analysis of evidence to improve patient outcomes as well as increased accountability. Understanding different forms of research and levels of evidence are critical in enhancing the validity, reliability, and applicability of the research and evidence-based practice processes. When selecting the research process, it is necessary to consider the level of evidence. Levels of evidence, sometimes called the hierarchy of evidence, are always assigned to the studies on the basis of methodological quality of their validity, design, as well as applicability to patient care (Glasofer & Townsend, 2021). A combination of qualitative and quantitative research processes is always required to enhance the research processes’ effective outcomes. Quantitative research designs require adherence to the data collection and analysis processes. The quantitative approaches are necessary for ensuring the establishment of valid, reliable, as well as applicability of the research outcomes (Bansal et al., 2018). To select a viable research study process, it is necessary for the researcher to consider the hierarchy or level of evidence.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent References

Bansal, P., Smith, W. K., & Vaara, E. (2018). New ways of seeing through qualitative research. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.4004

Glasofer, A., & Townsend, A. B. (2021). Determining the level of evidence: experimental research appraisal. Nursing2021, 51(1), 60-63. https://journals.lww.com/nursing/Abstract/2021/01000/Determining_the_level_of_evidence__Experimental.15.aspx

Re: Topic 6 DQ 1

My idea from Topic 5 DQ 1 was workplace violence (WPV), and my initial topic was much too broad. Before finding the best current evidence, I need to identify a specific clinical problem to best search for an answerable question (DeNisco & Barker, 2016). Using the PICOT template: population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time, will help create that searchable question.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 

Population: Healthcare Workers

Intervention: Education and Training

Comparison: Workplace Violence

Outcome: Prevent or Minimize

Time: 1-year Period

The next step is searching. I recommend a good starting point in PubMed, mostly because articles are specific to nursing and many are free to access. My organization allows access to the commonly used databases such as the Cochran Library, CINAHL, Medline and is a benefit to avoid paying fees for full review articles.  GCU library also offers students access to these same resources.

After obtaining multiple sources of evidence, critical appraisal or grading evidence is next, from the strongest to weakest evidence (DeNisco & Barker, 2016). The gold standard and strongest evidence is a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials or clinical guidelines based on systematic reviews. Evidence sources may include qualitative or quantitative studies, reviews or clinical expertise, or patient preferences and values. The need is to quickly determine whether it is valid evidence and applicable to practice. Critical appraisal tools exist and ask specific questions based on the methodology or design of the study you are evaluating. Besides validity and usefulness, other criteria to assess include when last updated, clinical context and environment, and patient values and preference. One of my personal favorites, UpToDate, uses a graded approach, 1A being strongest whereas, 2C means a weak recommendation to use an intervention based on both quality of the evidence and patient preference.

Inquiry and asking the best clinical question in a PICOT format is critical to searching and finding the best evidence. Appraising the evidence and integrating this with patient values and preferences is necessary to make evidence-based-practice decisions within nursing.  My Cochrane Library search resulted in very low-to low-quality evidence, with the common databases searched and seven studies being included. There is limited evidence that some interventions might reduce aggression toward healthcare workers (Spelten et al., 2020).  April is National WPV Month and a great place to start to recognize that more research is needed. I recognize I need more experience in this process too.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent References

DeNisco, S. M., & Barker, A. M. (2016). Advanced practice nursing: essential knowledge for the profession. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Spelten E;Thomas B;O’Meara PF;Maguire BJ;FitzGerald D;Begg SJ; (2020, April 29). Organizational interventions for preventing and minimizing aggression directed towards healthcare workers by patients and patient advocates. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32352565/.

RESPOND TO BARBARA HERE

This is insightful, Barbara, consideration of the PICOT question is necessary for undertaking different research processes (Abbade et al., 2016). Also, it is always necessary to identify the ideal sources of information such as databases that may be applied in supporting the research process. Most of the databases contain essential forms of information that may be applied in addressing various aspects of the project. CINAHL, Cochran Library, and Medline are some of the databases that can be applied to review some of the best sources of information that can be used to authenticate the information required in the research processes. The quality of research processes often depends on the levels of evidence (Glasofer & Townsend, 2019). The level of evidence is always assigned to the studies on the basis of methodological quality of their validity, design, as well as applicability to patient care. To better develop a quality, reliable, valid, and applicable research process, sticking to the PICOT question is necessary. In other words, different researchers need to consider the PICOT question in ensuring the achievement of quality outcomes.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent References

Abbade, L. P., Wang, M., Sriganesh, K., Mbuagbaw, L., & Thabane, L. (2016). Framing of research question using the PICOT format in randomised controlled trials of venous ulcer disease: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literature. BMJ open, 6(11). https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/11/e013175.short

Glasofer, A., & Townsend, A. B. (2019). Determining the level of evidence. Nursing Critical Care, 14(6), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccn.0000580120.03118.1d

GINA

Re: Topic 6 DQ 1

My evidence-based practice would be centered around the utilization of new technologies by bedside nurses. I would do a literature review of peer-reviewed studies to further investigate this issue. Then I would develop a framework and intervention with said technology that could be both quantitatively and qualitatively measured. Both quantitative and qualitative data would be important because it would be necessary to study the numerical data regarding technology use, and it would also be important to know both nurse and patient responses to interventions, which could be gathered through surveys, questionnaires, and interviews. When researching, data would have to be recent, within the last five years, peer-reviewed, with adequate sample sizes. DeNisco and Barker say it best, “Not all evidence is created equal, and there is a need to use the best available evidence,” (2016, p.465). Peer-reviewed research is essential, because it helps maintain the quality of the research. Critical appraisals of research by other academic minds can both validate, provide transparency, ensure professionalism, academic integrity and ethically conducted research (Kelly, et al., 2014). Additionally, research should be recent. Just like the rest of the world, data ages and isn’t always applicable as people, the world, the population, and societies adapt and change. You want sources that reflect the newest and most up to date research available. And finally, data in research can be easily statistically manipulated, so sample sizes matter. If a sample size is too small, it often holds less statistical significance and cannot often be used to generalize to a population.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent References

DeNisco, S. M., & Barker, A. M. (2016). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Kelly, J., Sadeghieh, T., & Adeli, K. (2014). Peer review in scientific publications: Benefits, critiques, and a survival guide. EJIFCC, 25(3), 227–243. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975196/

RESPOND  HERE

This is insightful, Gina; in general, the application of technology is on the rise, which calls for increased research processes to enhance the understanding of different ways to integrate technological approaches in the research processes (Spelten et al., 2020). The utilization of technology by the bedside nurses is critical in ensuring quality treatment outcomes and patient safety. Usually, the integration of technology in the healthcare processes reduces the errors associated with general care. The literature review is essential in the study processes because it enhances the understanding of past research outcomes that may be applied in addressing some of the research processes’ aspects. In the research process, it is also necessary to consider qualitative and quantitative research approaches to enhance the achievement of valid, reliable, and applicable research processes (Bansal et al., 2018). While undertaking a literature review, it is necessary for the researcher to consider different databases that have authentic, reliable, and applicable sources of information that can be utilized in identifying the required information.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent References

Spelten E;Thomas B;O’Meara PF;Maguire BJ;FitzGerald D;Begg SJ; (2020, April 29). Organizational interventions for preventing and minimizing aggression directed towards healthcare workers by patients and patient advocates. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32352565/.

Bansal, P., Smith, W. K., & Vaara, E. (2018). New ways of seeing through qualitative research. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.4004

Great Post Issac ! I love the way you reference everything ! I agree on the CRAAP test, to evaluate evidence. Clinical practice should be supported by evidence-based practice. The most used method for any evidence-based project is the PICO (population, interventions, comparison, outcome) method) method. This involves asking a PICO question. Once the question is identified, databases are used to search for current evidence. Evidence can come from external or internal sources. Evidence from systematic review or randomized control trials are far more valuable that other evidence.  Applying the CRAAP (Currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose ) test to evaluate information found, allows to determine the appropriateness of the research. Currency indicates when the information was published or has been updated. Relevance allows to determine, if the audience is right for the information and if the information has been researched in other sources or not. Authority reveals the qualifications of the author or the credentials of the affiliated organization. Accuracy determines if the information is from a reliable source and if the content if free from bias. Lastly, the purpose reveals if the information researched is to teach, entertain, sell or persuade.

NUR 513 Topic 6 DQ 1 Recent Reference:

Research Guides. (n.d.). How to evaluate information sources: Craap Test. Retrieved September 5, 2022, from

https://researchguides.njit.edu/evaluate/CRAAP

The topic selected for the evidence-based practice project entails differentiating deep tissue injuries (DTIs) from other skin injuries within our in-patient population. DTIs are a concern as it presents the greatest challenge due to the propensity for deterioration to costly, life-altering, full thickness tissue wounds, even with optimal care Sullivan (2022, as cited in EPUAP et al., 2019). DTPIs are challenging in differentiating from other skin injuries such as purpura, hematoma, stage 2 pressure injures and bruises. For this evidence-based project peer review will be utilized. Peer reviews are considered a key mechanism to ensure quality and safety in health care systems (Kaehne et al., 2019). They involve direct (face to face) or indirect (remote) review of services through the analysis of routinely collected data, review of self-reports, and/or observations of care practices (Kaehne et al., 2019).

The article chosen is titled DifferentiatingDeep Tissue Pressure Injury (DTPI) From Other Causes of Purpura in the Sacrococcygeal Area: A Multiple Case Series.

Currency: The copyright year of this article is 2019, which is current for my evidence-based practice project.

Relevance:  Differentiating deep tissue injury from other skin injuries within our in-patient population is a concern because if a diagnosis of the skin injury is mislabeled, patient will receive recommendations of prevention and management that will not be effective. Furthermore, mislabeling may result in falsely elevated hospital-acquired pressure injury prevalence rates, inaccurate data used as a basis for quality improvement projects (Solmos et al., 2019). With that said, information within the article is applicable to my evidence-based project because on multiple case series of differentiating deep tissue injury from other causes of purpura in sacrococcygeal area it focuses. Purpura is one of several skin injuries that is difficult to differentiate from deep tissue injury. Purprua is visible hemorrhage into the skin, appears purple and is non blanched upon application of external pressure (Solmos et al., 2019).

The audience for this journal article includes health care professionals that specialize in wound, ostomy, and continence care, including nurses, physicians, physical therapists, and other health care providers (Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurse Society, 2024). I would quote/reference information from this article in my project because it is from a reliable source.

Authority: The article was reviewed and published in the Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing. This is the official journal of the Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurse Society which collaborates closely with The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing Certification Board (WOCNCB^). The Journal’s mission is to publish current, best evidence and original research to guide the delivery of expert health care (Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society, 2024). This study was reviewed and approved by the University of Chicago Institutional review board (IRB); approval no. IRB17-0457 (Solmos et al., 2019).

The authors consist of physicians and nurses with advanced degrees with certification in wound, ostomy, and continence, which makes them experts in the content of this article. They are affiliated with the University of Chicago Medicine. The primary author’s contact information is provided, and no conflict of interest was reported in this article.  

Accuracy: The article is peer reviewed, evidence based and cited correctly. The authors cited articles with similar perspectives. The content is well organized and provides an abstract, background information, purpose of study, method, discussion section that contains limitations of the study and conclusion. The tone of this article is professional language.

Purpose: The purpose of the article is to educate and inform, on three case series of differentiating deep tissue injury from other causes of purpura in sacrococcygeal area. The intended audience for this journal article includes health care professionals that specialize in wound, ostomy, and continence care, including nurses, physicians, physical therapists, and other health care providers (WOCN, 2024). The authors reported there were no conflicts of interest.

The conclusion presented in this article is that the interdisciplinary approach adopted was useful in determining the cause of purpura when the DTPI was ruled out by the certified wound care nurse (Solmos et al., 2019).  

Nursing research is utilized in every aspect of healthcare. It is used for health promotion and prevention, to improve care delivery, and to develop new programs and technologies for the health care system. Many types of nursing research can be used to solve issues facing the healthcare industry. Research is the basis for providing evidence-based care. Two types of research are qualitative and quantitative. There is no definitive way to explain qualitative research. This type of research approaches a problem from and attempts to find the solution by gaining an understanding of every facet of the problem, and identifying key concepts and constructs of the problem ( Chicca, 2020). Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics. Quantitative research “seeks to confirm that all problems, dilemmas, or hypotheses have clear, concrete, and objective solutions that can be expressed in a numerical format” (Libguide, 2023). 

Regardless of what type of research is used, the sources need to be verified as being credible sources of information. One way to determine the credibility of sources is to use the CRAAP test. CRAAP determines a source’s currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. According to the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), currency refers to the timeliness of the source, relevance refers to the importance of the information to your issue, authority refers to the credentials of the source of information, accuracy refers to the reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the content, and purpose refers to the reason the information exists (NJIT, 2020).

The evidence-based practice project idea that I chose in Topic 5 DQ 1 is patient education on disease management and prevention in the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) population. Qualitative peer-reviewed research would be the best method to provide further research on this topic. “This type of research focuses on systems, steps, rituals, processes, best practices, observations, or personal experiences, and may or may not have an outcome” (Libguide, 2023). Qualitative research provides evidence-based results. The article I selected to further evaluate my project idea is Illness Perception in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Failure: A Scoping Review Protocol. The CRAAP Test results for the article is as follows:

Currency: The article was published in 2021. It was published in the last five years.

Relevance: The article focuses on patient education for the management of chronic kidney disease.

Authority: The article was written by authors that have expert credentials. Jia Hwei Ng works for the Division of Kidney Diseases and Hypertension, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, New York, USA. Jaclyn Vialet works at the  Clinical Medical Library, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York, USA.  Michael A Diefenbach works at the Center of Health Innovation and Outcomes Research, Manhasset, New York, USA.

 

Accuracy: The article has been peer-reviewed and has accurate information. It has credible sources cited.

 

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to map and summarize the literature on illness perception across the CKD population at stages of the disease, kidney failure, and kidney transplantation. Also to identify the knowledge gaps and guide the next phase of research in this area (Hwei, et al, 2021).

 

Chicca, J. (2020). Introduction to Qualitative Nursing Research. American Nurse. https://www.myamericannurse.com/introduction-to-qualitative-nursing-research/#:~:text=Some%20of%20the%20evidence%20should,tends%20to%20be%20more%20emphasized.

Hwei, J., Vialet, J., & Diefenbach, M.A. (2021). Illness Perception in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Failure: A Scoping Review Protocol. National Library of Medicine. https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.lopes.idm.oclc.org/pmc/articles/PMC7888318/

Libguide. (2023). Understanding Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Nursing. John B. Cade Library. https://subr.libguides.com/c.php?g=821764&p=5864888

New Jersey Institute of Technology. (2020). CRAAP Test: How to Evaluate Information Sources. https://researchguides.njit.edu/evaluate/CRAAP

The evidence-based project practice involved improving the approach of care delivery in the clinical nurse specialist practice using the holistic nursing theory. Continuous quality improvement process requires critical review and analysis of the nursing scholarly research and developing up-to-date and effective practice interventions. Reviewing quantitative research and peer-reviewed journals is required to further investigate the issue of poor patients’ outcomes in the clinical nursing specialist practice. Such researches provide reliable and credible evidence to support the causative factors to the existence of the issue and based on the report, proper recommendations can be developed to improve the nursing practice.

Various factors are considered in evaluating the appropriateness of a research. First, the research must have employed an appropriate study design and recruited sufficient sample population (Claydon, 2015). For example, the sample population characteristics must represent the true features and experiences of the general population. Enough and appropriate sample population is required to produce credible and reliable research findings. Additionally, the study must have a clear data analysis tool and statistical tests. Randomized control trials are preferred in the clinical research because they present strong evidence to support causality or the existence of a given phenomenon among the populations of interest (Ten Ham-Baloyi & Jordan, 2016).

Selecting an appropriate research is important for evidence-based nursing practice recommendation. The checklists help in ensuring that the conclusion derived from the research is reliable and can be inferred to the general population. Poor choice of the research may lead to misinterpretation of the existing clinical problems; therefore, it may be impossible to fully address the issue because of the lack of sufficient scholarly evidence. Furthermore, the research ought to be based on the targeted population characteristics to be relevant.

References

Claydon, L. S. (2015). Rigour in quantitative research. Nursing Standard, 29(47), 43.

Ten Ham-Baloyi, W., & Jordan, P. (2016). Systematic review as a research method in postgraduate nursing education. Health Sa Gesondheid, 21(1), 120-128.