NR 703 Advanced Practice Leadership from an Ethic of Care

NR 703 Advanced Practice Leadership from an Ethic of Care

Student Name

Chamberlain University

NR-703: Applied Organizational & Leadership Concepts

Prof. Name

Date

Advanced Practice Leadership from an Ethic of Care

The purpose of this paper is to explore advanced practice leadership through the lens of the ethic of care. This approach is contrasted with the ethic of justice, each offering unique insights into ethical decision-making within healthcare. Furthermore, the discussion evaluates the role of interprofessional collaboration and examines how ethical dilemmas influence leadership and organizational practices. Leaders who ground their behaviors in ethical principles are better equipped to navigate moral challenges, reducing burnout and demoralization among healthcare staff.

Description of Ethic of Care versus Ethic of Justice Perspectives

When advanced practice leaders encounter ethical dilemmas, they often rely on structured frameworks to guide decision-making. Two of the most frequently utilized perspectives in healthcare ethics are the ethic of justice and the ethic of care.

Ethic of Justice

The ethic of justice emphasizes fairness, equity, and adherence to moral rules or standards. This approach ensures the equal distribution of healthcare resources and promotes impartial treatment for all patients (Botes, 2000). It focuses on consistency, rights, and universal ethical principles that guide fair decisions.

Ethic of Care

In contrast, the ethic of care emphasizes relationships, empathy, and attentiveness to individual needs (Van Hooft, 2011). This perspective values the interconnectedness of individuals and promotes a holistic approach that considers emotional, social, and psychological well-being in addition to medical treatment.

Both frameworks are essential; however, if used in isolation, they may create ethical tensions. Therefore, advanced practice leaders should integrate both approaches to achieve balance and ethical clarity in decision-making.

Ethic of Care

The ethic of care, introduced by Carol Gilligan, describes moral development as a process unfolding through three stages. These stages emphasize growth from self-focus toward moral responsibility and broader ethical understanding.

Stages of Ethic of Care

Stage	Primary Goal	Transition
Pre-conventional	Focus on individual survival	From self-centeredness to responsibility
Conventional	Goodness achieved through self-sacrifice	Balancing self-care with care for others
Post-conventional	Principle of non-violence and avoidance of harm	From goodness to truth and broader moral awareness

This model highlights the need to maintain harmonious relationships, seek compromise, and deliver holistic, patient-centered care. Nurses are expected to care for the whole person, addressing not only physical health but also emotional and social well-being (Nordhaug & Nortvedt, 2011).

According to Lachman (2012), four foundational elements define the ethic of care:

Foundational Elements
Moral attention
Sympathetic understanding
Relationship awareness
Commitment to harmony

Nurse leaders who adopt this framework demonstrate empathy, trust, and holistic engagement. Unlike transactional care, the ethic of care represents a long-term commitment to patients’ needs, regardless of reciprocity or outcomes.

Ethic of Justice

The ethic of justice centers around the principles of fairness, autonomy, and beneficence.

• Fairness: Ensures that every patient receives equitable and unbiased treatment.

• Autonomy: Respects the patient’s right to make informed decisions about their care.

• Beneficence: Promotes acting in the patient’s best interest, even when circumstances are complex.

This framework prioritizes universal moral principles, valuing consistency even when clinical scenarios vary (Nordhaug & Nortvedt, 2011). When combined with the ethic of care, leaders can achieve an ethical balance that integrates justice with compassion, leading to decisions that are both fair and empathetic.

Reflection on the Application from an Ethic of Care Perspective

Question: What is the difference between caring for and caring about?

Caring for refers to the practical and professional aspects of care delivery, such as providing physical, emotional, or clinical support. It reflects competence and moral attentiveness in direct care activities.

Caring about, on the other hand, involves a deeper emotional connection—empathy, compassion, and responsiveness to others’ well-being. It reflects genuine concern for the person beyond procedural obligations.

The ethic of care integrates both approaches, emphasizing attentiveness, responsibility, competence, and responsiveness as essential dimensions of nursing care (Lachman, 2012).

The Role of Nurse Leaders in Applying the Ethic of Care

Advanced practice leaders play a pivotal role in cultivating environments that promote ethical care. This involves providing both structural and emotional support to healthcare staff and patients. Key leadership strategies include:

Strategies for Ethical Leadership	Purpose/Outcome
Ensuring adequate resources and support	To enable high-quality, ethical care
Establishing designated spaces for collaboration (e.g., family conference rooms)	To enhance communication and shared decision-making
Promoting access to ethics committees or consultants	To support ethical clarity in complex cases

Implementing these strategies enhances interprofessional collaboration, ensuring that patient-centered care aligns with both ethical frameworks (Simola, Barling, & Turner, 2012).

Case Reflections from Intensive Care Practice

Ethical dilemmas are especially common in intensive care settings, where clinical decisions often carry profound emotional and moral consequences.

Case 1

A 28-year-old Jehovah’s Witness awaiting a heart transplant refused blood products. Although the cardiothoracic surgeon respected the patient’s autonomy, some staff disagreed, believing it endangered patient safety. Their withdrawal of emotional support demonstrated a lack of respect for the patient’s values. According to the Code of Ethics for Nurses, honoring patient dignity and beliefs remains a professional duty (ANA, 2001).

Case 2

A 58-year-old man with advanced heart failure declined a transplant after reflecting on his quality of life. The nurse provided emotional support and guidance, enabling the patient to make an informed and autonomous decision. This example illustrates how the ethic of care transforms clinical actions into expressions of compassion that uphold autonomy and human dignity (Edwards, 2011).

NR 703 Advanced Practice Leadership from an Ethic of Care

In advanced practice leadership, ethical competence arises from balancing care-based and justice-oriented perspectives. Nurse leaders who apply both frameworks can reduce moral distress, foster teamwork, and enhance patient-centered care. When care and justice are integrated, they create a comprehensive ethical foundation for healthcare leadership.

DNP-prepared nurse leaders are particularly equipped to achieve this balance, merging clinical expertise with ethical reasoning to provide care that is both equitable and compassionate.

Conclusion

Ethical leadership in advanced nursing practice rests on the integration of the ethic of care and the ethic of justice. While the ethic of care emphasizes empathy, relationships, and compassion, the ethic of justice ensures fairness, integrity, and respect for rights. Together, they enable nurse leaders to navigate ethical dilemmas, foster interprofessional collaboration, and promote patient-centered outcomes. By embedding these principles within organizational culture, leaders can uphold dignity, reduce moral distress, and strengthen ethical decision-making across healthcare systems.

References

American Nurses Association (ANA). (2001). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Silver Spring, MD: Author.

Botes, A. (2000). A comparison between the ethics of justice and the ethics of care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(5), 1071–1075.

Edwards, S. D. (2011). Three versions of an ethics of care. Nursing Philosophy, 10(4), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2009.00415.x

Lachman, V. (2012). Applying the ethics of care to your nursing practice. MedSurg Nursing, 21(2), 112–116.

NR 703 Advanced Practice Leadership from an Ethic of Care

Nordhaug, M., & Nortvedt, P. (2011). Justice and proximity: Problems for an ethics of care. Health Care Analysis, 19(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-010-0159-3

Simola, S., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2012). Transformational leadership and leaders’ mode of care reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1080-x

Van Hooft, S. (2011). Caring, objectivity and justice: An integrative view. Nursing Ethics, 18(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733010388927