Instructions: Module 4: Critical Appraisal of a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) For this RCT critical appraisal assignment, you will complete an appraisal of the following article:

Instructions: Module 4: Critical Appraisal of a Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

For this RCT critical appraisal assignment, you will complete an appraisal of the following article:

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project

Write My Essay For Me

Respond to this prompt following rubric guidelines as posted:

State your overall appraisal of this article (include/exclude/seek further info) and provide a rationale of approximately 2-3 paragraphs, citing evidence from the article, as to why you think the article is appropriate to include or not in the making of a clinically-based decision. This will be your response to the final question on the CASP RCT Checklist.
Complete the CASP RCT Checklist Download CASP RCT Checklist Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReadercritical appraisal tool and use this information to guide your final thoughts on the usefulness of this article. Be sure to provide examples and support for your responses. Please do not simply answer “yes” or “no”. You will write your responses directly on the tool. If you do not have room to write a response, you may write it on a separate page–just identify which question it goes with. No additional papers are needed for this assignment.

RCT Critical Appraisal Rubric (1)

RCT Critical Appraisal Rubric (1)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section A–Introduction and Basic Study Design

4 pts

The student introduces the article, evaluates each component of the validity of the basic study design identified on the CASP Checklist, and provides a rationale for responses.

2 pts

Some of the components are missing from the report such as a response to the question or supporting rationale for the responses.

0 pts

More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section B–Study Methodology

4 pts

The student responds to/evaluates each component of the validity of the study methodology identified on the CASP Cheklslist and provides a rationale for responses.

2 pts

Some of the components are missing from the report such as a response to the question or supporting rationale for the responses.

0 pts

More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section C–Results

4 pts

The student responds to/evaluates each component of the clarity of the results section identified on the CASP Checklist and provides a rationale for responses.

2 pts

Some of the components are missing from the report such as a response to the question or supporting rationale for the responses.

0 pts

More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP RCT Checklist: Section D: Clinical Applicability of the Results

4 pts

The student responds to/evaluates each component of the validity of the clinical applicability identified on the CASP Checklist and provides a rationale for responses.

2 pts

Partially Correct

Only 1 follow-up question is included with the initial post; or questions are uploaded after the initial post is made.

0 pts

More than half the information is missing or incomplete., The rationale is not appropriate to support the responses or is superficial in depth.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCASP Appraisal Summary

4 pts

The student composes a thoughtful and in-depth response summarizing the article and its applicability to clinical practice. The student writes with a professional tone at a graduate level / scholarly tone

2 pts

The student provides a response that is mainly supported by statements from the appraisal and shows some depth of response. The student writes with a professional tone at a graduate level / scholarly tone with few errors.

0 pts

The response shows no depth and does not adequately provide a summary of the needed information. There are numerous spelling, punctuation, case, or grammatical issues

4 pts

Total Points: 20

The post Instructions: Module 4: Critical Appraisal of a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) For this RCT critical appraisal assignment, you will complete an appraisal of the following article: appeared first on Write My Paper.

Save your valuable time by using our professional essay writing service. We assure you of exceptional quality, punctual delivery, and utmost confidentiality. Every paper we provide is meticulously crafted from scratch, precisely tailored to your instructions, and completely free of plagiarism. Trust us to deliver excellence in academic writing.

Together we can improve your grades. Our team of competent online assignment writers provides professional writing help to students in all academic levels. Whether you need a narrative essay, 5-paragraph essay, persuasive essay, descriptive essay, or expository essay, we will provide you with quality papers at student friendly price.

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Ask for Instant Assignment Writing Help. No Plagiarism Guarantee!