HLSC220 Written Essay (1) Marking Rubric Criteria Ratings Points Ethical concepts 30 to >25 pts HD Ethical concepts (e.g., bio-ethical principles, virtues, ethical theories) are discussed comprehensively

HLSC220 Written Essay (1) Marking Rubric

Criteria Ratings Points

Ethical concepts

30 to >25 pts

HD

Ethical concepts (e.g., bio-ethical principles, virtues, ethical theories) are discussed comprehensively

-66041233998 and accurately in relation to the topic.

25 to >22.5 pts

DI

Ethical concepts (e.g., bio-ethical principles, virtues, ethical theories) are discussed at a high level and

-11493521717000 accurately in relation to the topic.

22.5 to >19 pts

CR

Ethical concepts (e.g. bio-ethical principles, virtues, ethical theories) are discussed soundly

-66041220345and usually accurately in relation to the topic.

19 to >15 pts

PA

Ethical concepts (e.g. bio-ethical principles, virtues, ethical theories) are discussed satisfactorily

-89852263843and often accurately in relation to the topic.

15 to >0 pts

NN

Ethical concepts (e.g. bio-ethical principles, virtues, ethical theories) are not discussed satisfactorily

-75565264478or accurately in relation to the topic.

0 pts

No marks

Ethical concepts (e.g. ethical theories, human dignity, veracity, professional codes and standards

of practice) are not discussed in relation to the topic. / 30 pts

Application

8959855629275876935447675088169722288508959851052513 HD

30 to >25 pts

Identifies all aspects of relationship between the selected topic & professional practice. Comprehensively

describes these relationships and their relevance to healthcare practice.

25 to >22.5 pts

DI

Identifies most aspects of relationship between the selected topic & professional practice. Describes

these relationships and their relevance to healthcare practice to a high-standard.

22.5 to >19 pts

CR

Identifies a sound range of aspects of relationship between the selected topic & professional practice.

-89853215583 Describes these relationships and their relevance to healthcare practice to a sound standard.

19 to >15 pts

PA

Identifies an adequate range of aspects of relationship between the selected topic & professional practice.

Describes these relationships and their relevance to healthcare practice to an adequate standard.

15 to >0 pts

NN

Identifies few of the aspects of relationship between the selected topic & professional practice.

Inadequately describes these relationships and their relevance to healthcare practice.

0 pts

No marks

Does not identify any aspects of the relationship between the selected topic & professional practice. Does not attempt to describe these relationships and their relevance to healthcare practice. / 30 pts

835660-129032000852170-242951000Critique & Defence

25 to >21 pts HD

Ethical arguments (use of argument and/or counter arguments) demonstrate a sophisticated level of

critical thinking, reasoning, defence & evaluation. All ethical arguments are informed by diverse, credible,

well-chosen scholarly sources, and professional codes & standards.

21 to >18.5 pts DI

Ethical arguments (use of argument and/or counter arguments) demonstrate a highly developed level of

critical thinking, reasoning, defence & evaluation. Almost all ethical arguments are informed by credible,

well-chosen scholarly sources and professional codes & standards.

18.5 to >16 pts CR

Ethical arguments (use of argument and/or counter arguments) demonstrate a well-developed level of

critical thinking, reasoning, defence & evaluation. Many ethical arguments are informed by credible

-9144025717500scholarly sources, &/or professional codes & standards.

16 to >12.5 pts

PA

Ethical arguments (use of argument and/or counter arguments) demonstrate a sound level of critical

thinking, reasoning, defence &/or evaluation. Some ethical arguments are informed by credible scholarly

-7874016446500sources, &/or professional codes & standards.

12.5 to >0 pts

NN

Ethical arguments (use of argument and/or counter arguments) are limited and demonstrate a developing

level of critical thinking, reasoning, defence &/or evaluation. Arguments are not adequately informed by

-11493520637500 credible ethical thought and or scholarly sources, professional codes & standards.

0 pts

No marks

No evidence of critical thinking, reasoning & evaluation evident. No ethical arguments are presented.

-10668028384500No arguments are informed by credible scholarly sources &/or professional codes & standards. / 25 pts

Composition

15 to >12.5 pts

HD

The essay begins with an exemplary introduction introducing the topic and main ethical arguments. The

argument is organised in an exemplary manner: repetitiveness is avoided; the argument flows logically

and succinctly. Exemplary use of academic writing and writing conventions. APA intext citations and

reference protocols are followed at an exemplary level. The assessment ends with a comprehensive and

-85090177483rational conclusion.

12.5 to >11 pts

DI

The essay begins with a high-level introduction that introduces the topic and the main ethical arguments.

The argument is organised in a logical manner: repetitiveness is avoided; the argument usually flows

logically. High quality use of academic writing and writing conventions. APA intext citations and reference

-9652025146000 protocols are followed at a high-level. The assessment ends with a very clear and rational conclusion.

11 to >9.5 pts

CR

The essay begins with a strong introduction that introduces the topic and main ethical arguments. The

argument is mostly organised in a logical manner: repetitiveness is generally avoided; the argument often

flows logically. Strong use of academic writing and writing conventions. In most cases APA intext citations

-11049024955500and reference protocols are followed appropriately. The assessment ends with a clear conclusion.

9.5 to >7.5 pts

PA

The essay begins with a satisfactory introduction that introduces the topic and main ethical arguments.

The argument is somewhat organised: some repetitiveness is evident. Satisfactory use of academic

writing and writing conventions. APA intext citations and reference protocols are followed adequately.

The assessment ends with an adequate conclusion.

7.5 to >0 pts

NN

The essay has an introductory paragraph but does not clearly introduce the topic and does not refer to the

ethical argument. The argument is poorly organised: repetitiveness is evident; does not demonstrate

logical progression of ideas. Poor use of academic writing and writing conventions. APA intext citations

-94615210185and reference protocols are poorly followed. The conclusion is weak or is poorly presented.

0 pts

No marks

There is no relevant introduction. There is no organisation to the content. Use of APA intext citations and

-14033523241000 reference protocols not evident. There is no relevant conclusion. / 15 pts

Total points:

The post HLSC220 Written Essay (1) Marking Rubric Criteria Ratings Points Ethical concepts 30 to >25 pts HD Ethical concepts (e.g., bio-ethical principles, virtues, ethical theories) are discussed comprehensively appeared first on Write My Paper.