Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3

Chamberlain University Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3                  

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3                  

The introduction for the Chamberlain University Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3 is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3                  

After the introduction, move into the main part of the Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3                  

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3                  

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3 assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3

In this paper, the focus is on family nurse practitioners. Several forms of biasness are present in our regular environment, which has a particular impact on the practice of family nurses. Any form of biasness tends to affect the quality of services provided within the periphery of nursing practices. The bias is more pronounced element in the healthcare system that brings down the quality of services. This leads to a non-deliberate reduction in the performance of activities that are performed by the nurses on a daily basis. When there is a shift in cost of services provided by family nurse practitioners when a bias peeps into the system. The cost of activities tends to rise as the motivation of the nurses reduces and there is a reduction in the overall performance of the nurses (Klemenc‐Ketis & Kersnik, 2014).

As elucidated by Alligood (2014) several personal biasness find their way in the family nursing practice, which tends to affect the aspects of culture, gender and sexuality, and the religion of the client that is being treated under nursing practice. Issue often roots out from problems oriented to the health of the patient. This may in particular be that of obesity-induced issues, biasness against individuals with diabetes and so on. Often such individuals suffering medical illness of the common type are refrained from participating in the making of healthcare standards and guidelines for the daily activities of family nurses.

In my experience, as a family nurse practitioner I am highly biased against individuals who are not accurate in their level of verbal and written presentations. Often I do not even give them the due chance to individuals who are slow in their operational activities. This has given rise to issue of team conflicts, which reduced the rate of success of operation, or there is delay in completion or often rise in cost of completion or the time line tends to be crossed.

The level of bias can come down to a great extent by ensuring that the process of educating the staff deployed as family nursing practitioners. It is essential for the leaders to make significant investment and undergo critical decision making in order to resolve conflicts within the system and raise the understanding and ability of each employee in line with the needs of the system (McCormack & McCance, 2017).

References

Alligood, M. R. (2014). Nursing theorists and their work. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Klemenc‐Ketis, Z., & Kersnik, J. (2014). New tool for patient evaluation of nurse practitioner in primary care settings. Journal of clinical nursing, 23(9-10), 1323-1331.

McCormack, B., & McCance, T. (2017). Person-centred practice in nursing and health care. Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Purpose

In today’s current healthcare settings, the increasing diversity, globalization, and expanding technologies produce complex ethical pressures that influence nursing practice and practice outcomes. To be effective in a master’s-prepared advanced nurse practice role it is important to understand personal values, beliefs, strengths, and limitations. The purpose of this assessment is to promote introspective reflection related to implicit and/or explicit personal biases. Students will develop a plan to reduce bias and promote personal and professional growth.

Course Outcomes

Through this assessment, the student will meet the following Course Outcomes.

CO 1: Examine roles and competencies of master’s-prepared nurses essential to performing as leaders and advocates of safe and quality care.

CO 2: Apply concepts of person-centered care to nursing practice situations.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS Addressing Bias Assignment: NR 500 Week 3:

Total Points Possible

This assessment is worth 125 points.

Due Date

Submit your file(s) by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 3.

Requirements

Criteria for Content

Complete a self-inventory on personal biases you hold. The biases might be implicit or explicit.

1. In a one to two-page summary, address the following.
   1. Identify your selected specialty track (education, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics).
   1. Discuss how biases can impact outcomes in selected nursing practice settings.
   1. Identify personal biases and attitudes toward people with various cultural, gender, sexual orientation, age, weight, and religions that are different than your own.
   1. Select one bias that you have.
   1. Develop one strategy to reduce this bias. 

Preparing the paper

Submission Requirements

1. Application: Use Microsoft Word 2013™ to create the written assessment. 
2. Length: The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is at maximum two pages.
3. A minimum of two (2) scholarly literature references must be used.
4. Submission: Submit your files: Last name_First initial_Wk3Assignment_Addressing Bias

Best Practices in Preparing the Project

The following are best practices in preparing this project.

1. Review directions thoroughly.
2. Follow submission requirements.
3. Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.
4. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
5. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
6. Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.
7. A minimum of two (2) scholarly literature references must be used.
8. Abide by CCN academic integrity policy.

Grading Criteria

Category	Points	%	Description
Introduction	12	10%	Introduction includes general statements on biases and how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes. Identify sections of the paper. Provide support from scholarly literature.
Discussion of Bias	38	30%	Identification of selected specialty track. Discuss how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice. Provide citations from scholarly nursing literature that support your position.
Identification of Personal Bias	6	5%	Identify one personal bias that you have. Identify if the bias is implicit or explicit in nature.
Strategy to Reduce Bias	19	15%	Develop one strategy to reduce bias.
Self-Reflection	32	25%	Provide a self-reflection regarding what was learned from completing this assessment.
APA Format	12	10%	Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section or topic of the paper (one deduction for each type of APA style error). Ideas and information that come from scholarly sources must be cited and referenced correctly.  A minimum of two (2) scholarly references are used.
Writing Mechanics	6	5%	Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual. For this assignment first person may be used.
Total	125	100	A quality assessment will meet or exceed all the above requirements.

 

Grading Rubric

Assessment Criteria	Exceptional (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance	Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance	Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance	Needs Improvement (38%) Poor or failing level of performance	Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance
Content Possible Points = 107 Points
Introduction	12 Points	11 Points	10 Points	5 Points	0 Points
Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: General statements on biasesGeneral statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and professionIdentification of sections of the paper  Support from scholarly literature	Presentation of information is superficial and includes all of the following elements: General statements on biasesGeneral statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and professionIdentification of sections of the paper  Support from scholarly literature	Presentation of information is minimally demonstratedand includes all of the following elements: General statements on biasesGeneral statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and professionIdentification of sections of the paper  Support from scholarly literature	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: General statements on biasesGeneral statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and professionIdentification of sections of the paper  Support from scholarly literature	Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: General statements on biasesGeneral statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and professionIdentification of sections of the paper  Support from scholarly literature
Discussion of Bias (first person may be used)	38 Points	33 Points	30 Points	14 Points	0 Points
Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements:  Identifies selected specialty trackDiscusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature	Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: Identifies selected specialty trackDiscusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature	Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements:  Identifies selected specialty trackDiscusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: Identifies selected specialty trackDiscusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practiceProvides citations from scholarly nursing literature	Presentation of information in two or more following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: Identifies selected specialty trackDiscusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature
Identification of Personal Bias (first person may be used)	6 Points		4 Points	2 Points	0 Points
Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: Identifies one personal biasIdentifies if the bias is implicit or explicit in nature		Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements:  Identifies one personal biasIdentifies if the bias is implicit or explicit in nature	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: Identifies one personal biasIdentifies if the bias is implicit or explicit in nature	Presentation of information in both following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: Personal bias is not identified. Nature of bias is not identified.
Strategy to Reduce Bias (first person may be used)	19 Points		15 Points		0 Points
Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise: Develops one strategy to reduce bias		Presentation is minimally demonstrated: Develops one strategy to reduce bias		Presentation of information is missing: Strategy to reduce bias is not developed.
Self-Reflection (first person may be used)	32 Points	28 Points	26 Points	12 Points	0 Points
Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice	Presentation of information is good but superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice	Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice	Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice	Presentation of information in the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice
Content Subtotal  ___ /107 points
Format Possible Points = 18 Points
APA Format	12 Points	11 Points	10 Points	5 Points	0 Points
APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the title page; running head;body of paper (including citations and headings); andreference page.   One deduction for each type of APA format error.   0 to 1 APA error is present	APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the title page; running head;body of paper (including citations and headings); andreference page.   One deduction for each type of APA format error. 2–3 APA errors are present	APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the title page; running head;body of paper (including citations and headings); andreference page.   One deduction for each type of APA format error.   4–5 APA errors are present	APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the title page; running head;body of paper (including citations and headings); andreference page.   One deduction for each type of APA format error.   6–7 APA errors are present	APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the title page; running head;body of paper (including citations and headings); andreference page.   One deduction for each type of APA format error.   8 or greater APA errors are present
References and Page Length Note: Students are to use at least two (2) scholarly references current within 5 years. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least one but no more than two pages.					2 Point Deduction
				Does not use at least two (2) current scholarly references and/or exceeds required page length.
Writing Mechanics	6 Points	5 Points	4 Points	2 Points	0 Points
1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.	3–4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.	5–6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.	7–8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.	9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.
Format Subtotal ____/18 points
Total Points ____/125points
Comments: