DIT 8214 Week 4 DQ: Compliance With Regulatory Requirements

Order ready-to-submit essays - 100% plagiarism-free guaranteed!

Note: Our papers are 100% human-written. 

DIT 8214 Week 4 DQ: Compliance With Regulatory Requirements Student Name University Prof Date Compliance With Regulatory Requirements Various integrated systems and automated processes allow the organization to use technology as a key enabler to compliance with the regulations. The organization uses a centralized compliance management platform that tracks real-time compliance with the policies of information security and tracks the activities of employees, along with warning about possible violations before they deteriorate. Complex data analysis software can assist in determining the trends of non-conformity and evaluating the risk levels in various departments and geographical regions (Odetunde et al., 2022). The organization has executed the programs of automated training that provide businesses with regular updates on the security policy and regulatory requirements, the completion of which is tracked using our learning management system (Hatzivasilis et al., 2020). The organization also uses security information and event management (SIEM) systems, which ensure round-the-clock monitoring of network activities, sending alerts when set security standards are violated, and thus facilitating prevention and detective controls as Niemi (2023) suggests in order to ensure effective compliance under the board of directors. In the 60 variables Sommestad et al. (2014) identified, the attitude towards compliance is one of the strongest predictors whose effect sizes vary between 0.15 and 0.64 across studies. This variable can be seen in our organization in terms of how much the employees perceive the security policy compliance to have a positive impact and not a negative impact on them. The organization has noted that employees who feel the information security policies serve the organizational and personal interests tend to comply with the policies more. One way in which the organization goes about it is by not making security measures a form of restrictions but a means of protection that ensures that the data of employees and the company assets are safe. The reasons behind security policies are constantly communicated by the leadership, as there is a need to underline how adherence helps to prevent breaches of data, which might lead to compromising information of employees and entrusting customers (Sommestad et al., 2014). The strategy fits within the research result that the emotional and attitudinal variables are more likely to predict compliance as compared to the purely rational or punishment-based approaches. Another important variable for our organization is subjective norm, which describes the perceived attitudes of colleagues and supervisors towards compliance and has a weighted mean effect size of = 0.28 in seven investigations (Sommestad et al., 2014). We establish a culture in which security-conscious behavior becomes visibly acknowledged and rewarded, establishing peer pressure that fosters adherence, not seeing policy breaking as a shortcut to success. The awareness of information security, with an effect size of 0.31, is the knowledge of the employees about the rules and regulations of the security that our organization implements through the intensive onboarding and constant education programs (Sommestad et al., 2014). These programs do not just involve policy distribution but also involve practical scenarios, simulated phishing activity, and raising the issue of information security through regular security bulletins. The social influence of the subjective norms and the knowledge improvement of the awareness programs are combined to produce a reinforcing loop as the educated employees positively affect their colleagues and increase the overall compliance of the organization. By concentrating on this type of soft variable and not concentrating on the deterrence mechanisms such as sanctions, the organization can be classified as adopting a pull and not a push strategy of compliance (Sommestad et al., 2014). References for DIT 8214 Week 4 DQ: Compliance With Regulatory Requirements Hatzivasilis, G., Ioannidis, S., Smyrlis, M., Spanoudakis, G., Frati, F., Goeke, L., Hildebrandt, T., Tsakirakis, G., Oikonomou, F., Leftheriotis, G., & Koshutanski, H. (2020). Modern aspects of cybersecurity training and continuous adaptation of programs to trainees. Applied Sciences, 10(16), 5702. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165702 Odetunde, A., Adekunle, B. I., & Ogeawuchi, J. C. (2022). Using predictive analytics and automation tools for real-time regulatory reporting and compliance monitoring. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 3(2), 650–661. https://doi.org/10.54660/.ijmrge.2022.3.2.650-661 Sommestad, T., Hallberg, J., Lundholm, K., & Bengts Struggling With Your Paper? Get in Touch

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project

Write My Essay For Me

The post DIT 8214 Week 4 DQ: Compliance With Regulatory Requirements appeared first on Ace My Course.